Обсуждение: BUG #6096: ECPG set precision of double value to 14 digits
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6096
Logged by: Akira Kurosawa
Email address: kurosawa-akira@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.5
Operating system: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5
Description: ECPG set precision of double value to 14 digits
Details:
When I used host variable of double type in ECPG code,
the precision of the data was treated as 14 digits.
I executed following command.
--------------------------------------------------
EXEC SQL BEGIN DECLARE SECTION;
double dbl;
EXEC SQL END DECLARE SECTION;
EXEC SQL CONNECT TO testdb@localhost:5432 USER postgres;
dbl = 12345678901234; -- 14 digits
EXEC SQL INSERT INTO double_table (c1) VALUES (:dbl);
dbl = 1234567890.1234; -- 14 digits
EXEC SQL INSERT INTO double_table (c1) VALUES (:dbl);
dbl = 0.12345678901234; -- 14 digits
EXEC SQL INSERT INTO double_table (c1) VALUES (:dbl);
dbl = 123456789012345; -- 15 digits
EXEC SQL INSERT INTO double_table (c1) VALUES (:dbl);
dbl = 1234567890.12345; -- 15 digits
EXEC SQL INSERT INTO double_table (c1) VALUES (:dbl);
dbl = 0.123456789012345; -- 15 digits
EXEC SQL INSERT INTO double_table (c1) VALUES (:dbl);
EXEC SQL COMMIT;
EXEC SQL DISCONNECT;
--------------------------------------------------
Then I checked inserted data, but all data was stored by 14 digits
precision.
--------------------------------------------------
testdb=# \d double_table
Table "public.double_table"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------+------------------+-----------
c1 | double precision |
testdb=# SELECT * FROM double_table;
c1
------------------
12345678901234
1234567890.1234
0.12345678901234
123456789012340
1234567890.1235
0.12345678901234
(6 rows)
--------------------------------------------------
The precision of double type should be 15 digits,
and I think this result is wrong.
PostgreSQL 9.0.4 also shows the same result.
In function "ecpg_store_input:execute.c",
the value of double type is changed by sprintf to a character string
at 14 digits precision. I'm thinking this point is a problem.
sprintf(mallocedval, "%.14g", *((double *) var->value));
Following log is result of executing same query by psql.
--------------------------------------------------
testdb=# INSERT INTO double_table VALUES ('12345678901234');
INSERT 0 1
testdb=# INSERT INTO double_table VALUES ('1234567890.1234');
INSERT 0 1
testdb=# INSERT INTO double_table VALUES ('0.12345678901234');
INSERT 0 1
testdb=# INSERT INTO double_table VALUES ('123456789012345');
INSERT 0 1
testdb=# INSERT INTO double_table VALUES ('1234567890.12345');
INSERT 0 1
testdb=# INSERT INTO double_table VALUES ('0.123456789012345');
INSERT 0 1
testdb=# SELECT * FROM double_table;
c1
-------------------
12345678901234
1234567890.1234
0.12345678901234
123456789012345
1234567890.12345
0.123456789012345
(6 rows)
--------------------------------------------------
Hi,
I built PostgreSQL 8.4.8 with the following patch,
then executed same program.
This result is same as psql's one.
--------------------------------------------------
testdb=# SELECT * FROM double_table;
c1
-------------------
12345678901234
1234567890.1234
0.12345678901234
123456789012345
1234567890.12345
0.123456789012345
(6 rows)
--------------------------------------------------
*** execute.c.org 2011-04-15 12:17:14.000000000 +0900
--- execute.c 2011-07-16 19:46:05.000000000 +0900
***************
*** 709,720 ****
strcpy(mallocedval, "array [");
for (element = 0; element < asize; element++)
! sprintf(mallocedval + strlen(mallocedval), "%.14g,", ((double *)
var->value)[element]);
strcpy(mallocedval + strlen(mallocedval) - 1, "]");
}
else
! sprintf(mallocedval, "%.14g", *((double *) var->value));
*tobeinserted_p = mallocedval;
break;
--- 709,720 ----
strcpy(mallocedval, "array [");
for (element = 0; element < asize; element++)
! sprintf(mallocedval + strlen(mallocedval), "%.15g,", ((double *)
var->value)[element]);
strcpy(mallocedval + strlen(mallocedval) - 1, "]");
}
else
! sprintf(mallocedval, "%.15g", *((double *) var->value));
*tobeinserted_p = mallocedval;
break;
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 09:21:04PM +0900, Akira Kurosawa wrote: > I built PostgreSQL 8.4.8 with the following patch, > then executed same program. Thanks for the patch, applied. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL