Обсуждение: abstime bug
# select '1901/12/14 1:00'::abstime;
abstime
------------------------
2038-01-19 07:22:24+08
(1 row)
jw wrote:
> # select '1901/12/14 1:00'::abstime;
> abstime
> ------------------------
> 2038-01-19 07:22:24+08
> (1 row)
Current CVS shows:
test=> select '1901/12/14 1:00'::abstime;
abstime
------------------------
1901-12-14 01:00:00-05
(1 row)
What PostgreSQL version are you using?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:15:40AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Current CVS shows:
>
> test=> select '1901/12/14 1:00'::abstime;
> abstime
> ------------------------
> 1901-12-14 01:00:00-05
> (1 row)
Depends on your timezone:
SET TimeZone TO 'US/Eastern';
SELECT '1901/12/14 1:00'::abstime;
abstime
------------------------
1901-12-14 01:00:00-05
(1 row)
SET TimeZone TO 'Asia/Hong_Kong';
SELECT '1901/12/14 1:00'::abstime;
abstime
------------------------
2038-01-19 07:51:40+08
(1 row)
I'd guess this is due to the 32-bitness of abstime. Those timestamps
are around the min and max values of a 32-bit timestamp based on the
traditional Unix epoch.
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
Michael Fuhr wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 10:15:40AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Current CVS shows: > > > > test=> select '1901/12/14 1:00'::abstime; > > abstime > > ------------------------ > > 1901-12-14 01:00:00-05 > > (1 row) > > Depends on your timezone: > > SET TimeZone TO 'US/Eastern'; > SELECT '1901/12/14 1:00'::abstime; > abstime > ------------------------ > 1901-12-14 01:00:00-05 > (1 row) > > SET TimeZone TO 'Asia/Hong_Kong'; > SELECT '1901/12/14 1:00'::abstime; > abstime > ------------------------ > 2038-01-19 07:51:40+08 > (1 row) > > I'd guess this is due to the 32-bitness of abstime. Those timestamps > are around the min and max values of a 32-bit timestamp based on the > traditional Unix epoch. Yea, I see the same thing in 8.0.X. I don't think abstime should be used in that date range, timestamp is a better solution. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Michael Fuhr wrote:
>> I'd guess this is due to the 32-bitness of abstime. Those timestamps
>> are around the min and max values of a 32-bit timestamp based on the
>> traditional Unix epoch.
> Yea, I see the same thing in 8.0.X. I don't think abstime should be
> used in that date range, timestamp is a better solution.
It's still a bug though; if the value is out of range, abstimein should
reject it, not misconvert it.
regards, tom lane
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> SET TimeZone TO 'Asia/Hong_Kong';
> SELECT '1901/12/14 1:00'::abstime;
> abstime
> ------------------------
> 2038-01-19 07:51:40+08
> (1 row)
> I'd guess this is due to the 32-bitness of abstime. Those timestamps
> are around the min and max values of a 32-bit timestamp based on the
> traditional Unix epoch.
Fixed in CVS tip:
regression=# SET TimeZone TO 'Asia/Hong_Kong';
SET
regression=# SELECT '1901/12/14 1:00'::abstime;
abstime
---------
invalid
(1 row)
Doesn't seem important enough to back-patch, though.
regards, tom lane