Обсуждение: Polymorphism resgression test fails when BLCKSZ changed
Hi, The regression test fails on 'polymorphism' on three different computers with various architectures. (I hope this point was not raised before, but I did not find any relevant mail about it with '[BUGS]'in the subject line and 'polymorphism' in message body) Besides the configure options stated below, BLCKSZ was redefined from 8192 to 16384 before running configure. With default vakue (8192) make check runs smoothly. Machine 1 : (SuSE 8.2 i386) ----------- uname -m = i686 uname -r = 2.4.20-64GB-SMP uname -s = Linux uname -v = #1 SMP Wed Nov 17 20:29:59 UTC 2004 gcc 3.3.1 ./configure '--prefix=/usr' '--libdir=/usr/lib' '--bindir=/usr/bin' '-- includedir=/usr/include/pgsql' '--datadir=/usr/share/postgresql' '-- mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-docdir=/usr/share/doc/packages' '--with- includes=/usr/include/heimdal /usr/include/et' '--disable-rpath' '--enable- nls' '--enable-thread-safety' '--enable-integer-datetimes' '--with-python' '-- with-perl' '--with-tcl' '--without-tk' '--with-openssl' '--with-pam' 'CFLAGS=- O3 -march=pentium3 -mcpu=pentium3 -fmessage-length=0 -Wall' Machine 2 : (SuSE 9.1 i386) ----------- uname -m = i686 uname -r = 2.6.5-7.111.5-default uname -s = Linux uname -v = #1 Wed Nov 17 11:08:17 UTC 2004 gcc 3.3.3 ./configure '--prefix=/usr' '--libdir=/usr/lib' '--bindir=/usr/bin' '-- includedir=/usr/include/pgsql' '--datadir=/usr/share/postgresql' '-- mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-docdir=/usr/share/doc/packages' '--with- includes=/usr/include/heimdal /usr/include/et' '--disable-rpath' '--enable- nls' '--enable-thread-safety' '--enable-integer-datetimes' '--with-python' '-- with-perl' '--with-tcl' '--without-tk' '--with-openssl' '--with-pam' '--with- krb5' 'CFLAGS=-O3 -march=pentium3 -mcpu=pentium3 -fmessage-length=0 -Wall' Machine 3 : (IBM R/S 6000 - powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0) ----------- uname -m = 0057C2BA4C00 uname -r = 3 uname -s = AIX uname -v = 4 xlc C for AIX Compiler, Version 5 ./configure --without-readline --without-zlib ------------
j6m@cvni.net writes: > The regression test fails on 'polymorphism' on three different computers with > various architectures. Define "fails" (regression diffs output would be nice). > Besides the configure options stated below, BLCKSZ was redefined from 8192 to > 16384 before running configure. If it's just a change in output row order then it's not a bug ... regards, tom lane
It appears to be just that. Great, It works! *** ./expected/polymorphism.out Wed Dec 1 20:00:56 2004 --- ./results/polymorphism.out Tue Dec 21 19:06:12 2004 *************** *** 349,532 **** select f3, myaggp01a(*) from t group by f3; f3 | myaggp01a ----+----------- c | {} a | {} - b | {} (3 rows) select f3, myaggp03a(*) from t group by f3; f3 | myaggp03a ----+----------- c | {} a | {} - b | {} (3 rows) select f3, myaggp03b(*) from t group by f3; f3 | myaggp03b ----+----------- c | {} a | {} - b | {} (3 rows) select f3, myaggp05a(f1) from t group by f3; f3 | myaggp05a ----+----------- c | {1,2} a | {1,2,3} - b | {1,2,3} (3 rows) select f3, myaggp06a(f1) from t group by f3; f3 | myaggp06a ----+----------- c | {} a | {} - b | {} (3 rows) ---8<--- SNIP --- --- 349,532 ---- select f3, myaggp01a(*) from t group by f3; f3 | myaggp01a ----+----------- + b | {} c | {} a | {} (3 rows) select f3, myaggp03a(*) from t group by f3; f3 | myaggp03a ----+----------- + b | {} c | {} a | {} (3 rows) select f3, myaggp03b(*) from t group by f3; f3 | myaggp03b ----+----------- + b | {} c | {} a | {} (3 rows) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: <j6m@cvni.net> Cc: <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 6:58 PM Subject: Re: [BUGS] Polymorphism resgression test fails when BLCKSZ changed > j6m@cvni.net writes: > > The regression test fails on 'polymorphism' on three different computers with > > various architectures. > > Define "fails" (regression diffs output would be nice). > > > Besides the configure options stated below, BLCKSZ was redefined from 8192 to > > 16384 before running configure. > > If it's just a change in output row order then it's not a bug ... > > regards, tom lane