Обсуждение: bitmap_heap_scan vs sequential scan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

bitmap_heap_scan vs sequential scan

От
Mark Steben
Дата:
Good afternoon

I have what I think is a simple question.  Does the seq_scan column in the pg_stat_all_tables view include the number of  bitmap_heap_scans in its count or is it limited to sequential scans for a particular table?

Thank you,

--
Mark Steben
 Database Administrator
@utoRevenue | Autobase 
  CRM division of Dominion Dealer Solutions 
95D Ashley Ave.
West Springfield, MA 01089

t: 413.327-3045
f: 413.383-9567

www.fb.com/DominionDealerSolutions
www.twitter.com/DominionDealer
 www.drivedominion.com





Re: bitmap_heap_scan vs sequential scan

От
Albe Laurenz
Дата:
Mark Steben wrote:
> I have what I think is a simple question.  Does the seq_scan column in the pg_stat_all_tables view
> include the number of  bitmap_heap_scans in its count or is it limited to sequential scans for a
> particular table?

The column "seq_scan" does not count bitmap heap scans:

test=> SELECT seq_scan, idx_scan FROM pg_stat_all_tables WHERE relname = 'local';
 seq_scan | idx_scan
----------+----------
        5 |        3
(1 row)

test=> BEGIN;
BEGIN
test=> SET LOCAL enable_seqscan=off;
SET
test=> SET LOCAL enable_indexscan=off;
SET
test=> SET LOCAL enable_indexonlyscan=off;
SET
test=> EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) SELECT * FROM local WHERE id = 1;
                                                    QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Bitmap Heap Scan on local  (cost=4.14..8.15 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.018..0.019 rows=1 loops=1)
   Recheck Cond: (id = 1)
   Heap Blocks: exact=1
   ->  Bitmap Index Scan on local_pkey  (cost=0.00..4.14 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.012..0.012 rows=1 loops=1)
         Index Cond: (id = 1)
 Planning time: 0.069 ms
 Execution time: 0.048 ms
(7 rows)

test=> COMMIT;
COMMIT
test=> SELECT seq_scan, idx_scan FROM pg_stat_all_tables WHERE relname = 'local';
 seq_scan | idx_scan
----------+----------
        5 |        4
(1 row)

Yours,
Laurenz Albe