Hi. Is there any way I can force explicit use of transactions on insert/updates? I do have users sitting on the system, that may forget to code it that way and it would be nice to be able to force the database to just kick them out if it didn't happen. -- Jesper
Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc> wrote: > Is there any way I can force explicit use of transactions on > insert/updates? > > I do have users sitting on the system, that may forget to code it > that way and it would be nice to be able to force the database to > just kick them out if it didn't happen. Not that I can think of, unless you pass the queries through some proxy which enforces the rule. Generally, a statement outside of an explicit transaction block starts its own transaction for just that statement, just as if the statement were wrapped in BEGIN/COMMIT. You could maybe get glimpses of such statements by periodically looking at pg_stat_activity for statements which have the same timestamp for xact_start and query_start. -Kevin
Сайт использует файлы cookie для корректной работы и повышения удобства. Нажимая кнопку «Принять» или продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы соглашаетесь на их использование в соответствии с Политикой в отношении обработки cookie ООО «ППГ», в том числе на передачу данных из файлов cookie сторонним статистическим и рекламным службам. Вы можете управлять настройками cookie через параметры вашего браузера