Обсуждение: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions?

От
Mark Steben
Дата:
Hi all,
I'm evaluating the check_postgres program.  We are running postgres 8.3.
Does anybody have any experience with this monitoring software they would
like to share?  I'm specifically interested in the 'postgres_bloat' program but
would welcome any comments about anything germaine to check_postgres.

Thank you,

--

Mark Steben @ @utoRevenue



Re: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions?

От
Scott Marlowe
Дата:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Mark Steben
<mark.steben@autorevenue.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm evaluating the check_postgres program.  We are running postgres 8.3.
> Does anybody have any experience with this monitoring software they would
> like to share?  I'm specifically interested in the 'postgres_bloat' program
> but
> would welcome any comments about anything germaine to check_postgres.

I use it, it works fine, lots of development.  Note that bloat
checking is only as accurate as your last analyze.

Re: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions?

От
Mark Steben
Дата:
Thanks Scott - do you ship the output to Nagios?

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Mark Steben
<mark.steben@autorevenue.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm evaluating the check_postgres program.  We are running postgres 8.3.
> Does anybody have any experience with this monitoring software they would
> like to share?  I'm specifically interested in the 'postgres_bloat' program
> but
> would welcome any comments about anything germaine to check_postgres.

I use it, it works fine, lots of development.  Note that bloat
checking is only as accurate as your last analyze.



--

Mark Steben @ @utoRevenue

Database Administrator

@utoRevenue | Dominion Dealer Solutions

413-327-3045 (direct)

www.fb.com/dominiondealersolutions

www.twitter.com/dominiondealer

www.autorevenue.com






Re: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions?

От
Scott Marlowe
Дата:
I use it as both a nagios plugin and standalone.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Mark Steben
<mark.steben@autorevenue.com> wrote:
> Thanks Scott - do you ship the output to Nagios?
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Mark Steben
>> <mark.steben@autorevenue.com> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > I'm evaluating the check_postgres program.  We are running postgres 8.3.
>> > Does anybody have any experience with this monitoring software they
>> > would
>> > like to share?  I'm specifically interested in the 'postgres_bloat'
>> > program
>> > but
>> > would welcome any comments about anything germaine to check_postgres.
>>
>> I use it, it works fine, lots of development.  Note that bloat
>> checking is only as accurate as your last analyze.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mark Steben @ @utoRevenue
>
> Database Administrator
>
> @utoRevenue | Dominion Dealer Solutions
>
> 413-327-3045 (direct)
>
> www.fb.com/dominiondealersolutions
>
> www.twitter.com/dominiondealer
>
> www.autorevenue.com
>
>
>
>
>



--
To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.

Re: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions?

От
Jan Lentfer
Дата:
Am 20.10.2011 22:10, schrieb Scott Marlowe:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Mark Steben
> <mark.steben@autorevenue.com>  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm evaluating the check_postgres program.  We are running postgres 8.3.
>> Does anybody have any experience with this monitoring software they would
>> like to share?  I'm specifically interested in the 'postgres_bloat' program
>> but
>> would welcome any comments about anything germaine to check_postgres.
> I use it, it works fine, lots of development.  Note that bloat
> checking is only as accurate as your last analyze.
>
Same here, work great imho.

--
professional: http://www.oscar-consult.de
private: http://neslonek.homeunix.org/drupal/


Re: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions?

От
Leonardo Carneiro
Дата:
Here too! it just works. Maybe you'll want to check pgwatch [1] as well.

[1] http://goo.gl/uabBO

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Jan Lentfer <Jan.Lentfer@web.de> wrote:
Am 20.10.2011 22:10, schrieb Scott Marlowe:

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Mark Steben
<mark.steben@autorevenue.com>  wrote:
Hi all,
I'm evaluating the check_postgres program.  We are running postgres 8.3.
Does anybody have any experience with this monitoring software they would
like to share?  I'm specifically interested in the 'postgres_bloat' program
but
would welcome any comments about anything germaine to check_postgres.
I use it, it works fine, lots of development.  Note that bloat
checking is only as accurate as your last analyze.

Same here, work great imho.

--
professional: http://www.oscar-consult.de
private: http://neslonek.homeunix.org/drupal/



--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

Re: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions?

От
Vladimir Rusinov
Дата:


On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Mark Steben <mark.steben@autorevenue.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm evaluating the check_postgres program.  We are running postgres 8.3.
Does anybody have any experience with this monitoring software they would
like to share?  I'm specifically interested in the 'postgres_bloat' program but
would welcome any comments about anything germaine to check_postgres.

check_postgres works fine and perfectly maintained.

If you are looking something for Zabbix, you may want to try my project as well: https://bitbucket.org/rvs/ztc/ - good portion of postgres items are actually rewrite of check_postgres in python.

--
Vladimir Rusinov
http://greenmice.info/

Re: check_postgres monitor by Bucardo - any opinions?

От
Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
On tor, 2011-10-20 at 14:16 -0400, Mark Steben wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm evaluating the check_postgres program.  We are running postgres
> 8.3.
> Does anybody have any experience with this monitoring software they
> would
> like to share?  I'm specifically interested in the 'postgres_bloat'
> program but
> would welcome any comments about anything germaine to check_postgres.

It's a nice tool, but it has lots of bugs, and a new release usually
fixes 3 and introduces 2 new ones.  So I'm a little careful about
upgrading.