Обсуждение: Linux Cluster File Systems
Anyone have good/bad experience using OpenGFS or the Sistina GFS? Any other cluster file systems out there? Greg -- Greg Spiegelberg Sr. Product Development Engineer Cranel, Incorporated. Phone: 614.318.4314 Fax: 614.431.8388 Email: gspiegelberg@Cranel.com Cranel. Technology. Integrity. Focus. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com **********************************************************************
In article <40116DA1.7030209@cranel.com>, Greg Spiegelberg wrote: > Anyone have good/bad experience using OpenGFS or the Sistina GFS? > Any other cluster file systems out there? Lustre and CFS spring to mind. CFS is the cluster filesystem layer of openssi (http://www.openssi.org), which is layered on top of ext3 and provides the necessary locking. It can work with shared disk hardware, but I believe 1 node is always responsible for all transactions. It can fail-over to another node in the cluster, if that node has direct access to the disk. You can also use it without shared disk hardware (you loose the HA ofcourse). That way you can easily test openssi. Postgresql should work without problems on an OpenSSI cluster. I don't know much about Lustre (http://www.clusterfs.com)