Обсуждение: shared_buffers and effective_cache_size

Hi,
I just got a new Penguin machine with 2 processors and 2G RAM. After
installed postgres 7.2, I started to modify postgresql.conf to get max
performance. I read Adm Guide and Bruce's article: PostgreSQL Hardware
Performance Tuning, in my understanding, shared_buffers is similar to
Oracle's db_block_buffers, but also sometimes I feel it sounds like oracle's
SGA. When I reached effective_cache_size, don't know what's that, docs can't
help, it seems for optimizer, but how big should I set? no feeling! Does
anyone can compare this paremeter to oracle's so I can understand better.

If I set  SHARED_BUFFERS = 131072,  what effective_cache_size should be?


Thanks!


Anna Zhang

Zhang, Anna wrote:
> Hi,
> I just got a new Penguin machine with 2 processors and 2G RAM. After
> installed postgres 7.2, I started to modify postgresql.conf to get max
> performance. I read Adm Guide and Bruce's article: PostgreSQL Hardware
> Performance Tuning, in my understanding, shared_buffers is similar to
> Oracle's db_block_buffers, but also sometimes I feel it sounds like oracle's
> SGA. When I reached effective_cache_size, don't know what's that, docs can't
> help, it seems for optimizer, but how big should I set? no feeling! Does
> anyone can compare this paremeter to oracle's so I can understand better.
>
> If I set  SHARED_BUFFERS = 131072,  what effective_cache_size should be?

My guess is that effective_cache_size is an estimate of the amount of OS
caching memory available, rather than PostgreSQL shared buffers.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026