Re: Efficient String searching
Re: Efficient String searching
От:
"Ted Rolle" <ted@tvlconn.com>
Дата:
Like an implementation of Boyer-Moore-...? -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Stephan Szabo Sent: September 25, 2001 10:43 AM To: Robert.Farrugia@go.com.mt Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Efficient String searching On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 Robert.Farrugia@go.com.mt wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following problem. When doing string searches using the ilike > command, no indexes are being used. This is giving performance problems, > whereas it takes longer to sequentially search the whole table. Am i > missing something about searching for strings ? Are there any efficient > methods than using regular expressions or like ? Unless your pattern is anchored at the start, indexes don't get used. In addition, if you're in a locale other than C, indexes don't get used. It depends on the kind of string searches you're doing. If you're looking for words in a longer string, you probably want to look at a full text indexing solution. IIRC, there's one in contrib and a few others made by people on the lists. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Efficient String searching
От:
Robert.Farrugia@go.com.mt
Дата:
Hi, I have the following problem. When doing string searches using the ilike command, no indexes are being used. This is giving performance problems, whereas it takes longer to sequentially search the whole table. Am i missing something about searching for strings ? Are there any efficient methods than using regular expressions or like ? Thanks Robert
Re: Efficient String searching
От:
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Дата:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 Robert.Farrugia@go.com.mt wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following problem. When doing string searches using the ilike > command, no indexes are being used. This is giving performance problems, > whereas it takes longer to sequentially search the whole table. Am i > missing something about searching for strings ? Are there any efficient > methods than using regular expressions or like ? Unless your pattern is anchored at the start, indexes don't get used. In addition, if you're in a locale other than C, indexes don't get used. It depends on the kind of string searches you're doing. If you're looking for words in a longer string, you probably want to look at a full text indexing solution. IIRC, there's one in contrib and a few others made by people on the lists.