Обсуждение: restoring a backup and maintaining dependencies?

Hi again :)

I have saved out these commands:

CREATE TABLE group_items
( id serial NOT NULL, group_id integer, group_type text, item_id integer, visible integer, CONSTRAINT "group_items_PK"
PRIMARYKEY (id)
 
)
WITHOUT OIDS;
ALTER TABLE group_items OWNER TO postgres;


CREATE SEQUENCE group_items_id_seq INCREMENT 1 MINVALUE 1 MAXVALUE 9223372036854775807 START 1 CACHE 1;
ALTER TABLE group_items_id_seq OWNER TO postgres;


If I restore them in pgadmin will they become dependent on each other in 
the same way as if I created the table in pgadmin?  Or will they just 
become separate entities without any form of link?  If that IS the case, 
how can I link them with SQL code, rather than pgadmin?

Advice appreciated lots, I have a lot to learn here :|

rob

There is no difference between running this script and using the
pgadmin gui. pgadmin is just a front end to the database, it generates
the same sql that you would write manually.

If your table is group_items, name your sequence group_items_seq

Laurent

On 9/12/07, Robert Starr <rob@surrenderdorothy.com.au> wrote:
> Hi again :)
>
> I have saved out these commands:
>
> CREATE TABLE group_items
> (
>   id serial NOT NULL,
>   group_id integer,
>   group_type text,
>   item_id integer,
>   visible integer,
>   CONSTRAINT "group_items_PK" PRIMARY KEY (id)
> )
> WITHOUT OIDS;
> ALTER TABLE group_items OWNER TO postgres;
>
>
> CREATE SEQUENCE group_items_id_seq
>   INCREMENT 1
>   MINVALUE 1
>   MAXVALUE 9223372036854775807
>   START 1
>   CACHE 1;
> ALTER TABLE group_items_id_seq OWNER TO postgres;
>
>
> If I restore them in pgadmin will they become dependent on each other in
> the same way as if I created the table in pgadmin?  Or will they just
> become separate entities without any form of link?  If that IS the case,
> how can I link them with SQL code, rather than pgadmin?
>
> Advice appreciated lots, I have a lot to learn here :|
>
> rob
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>

Thank you so much, I wondered that.   Seemed over simple ;) as I thought there must be an explicit link rather than a
namingconvention.<br /><br /> :)  Thanks again.<br /><div class="moz-signature"></div><p align="left">Rob<br /> Laurent
Yaishwrote: <blockquote cite="mid:c7e3acb10709122251q2d99ce6emf01efa0008be4f37@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"><pre
wrap="">Thereis no difference between running this script and using the
 
pgadmin gui. pgadmin is just a front end to the database, it generates
the same sql that you would write manually.

If your table is group_items, name your sequence group_items_seq

Laurent

On 9/12/07, Robert Starr <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:rob@surrenderdorothy.com.au"><rob@surrenderdorothy.com.au></a>wrote: </pre><blockquote
type="cite"><prewrap="">Hi again :)
 

I have saved out these commands:

CREATE TABLE group_items
( id serial NOT NULL, group_id integer, group_type text, item_id integer, visible integer, CONSTRAINT "group_items_PK"
PRIMARYKEY (id)
 
)
WITHOUT OIDS;
ALTER TABLE group_items OWNER TO postgres;


CREATE SEQUENCE group_items_id_seq INCREMENT 1 MINVALUE 1 MAXVALUE 9223372036854775807 START 1 CACHE 1;
ALTER TABLE group_items_id_seq OWNER TO postgres;


If I restore them in pgadmin will they become dependent on each other in
the same way as if I created the table in pgadmin?  Or will they just
become separate entities without any form of link?  If that IS the case,
how can I link them with SQL code, rather than pgadmin?

Advice appreciated lots, I have a lot to learn here :|

rob

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
 </pre></blockquote>