Обсуждение: Should we keep using trac?
Quick question: is trac the right tool? I mainly use it as a wiki (for example the list of wxWidgets 2.9 compatibility issues, and the list of issues with the Database Designer) and as a BUGS/TODO list (with the tickets). Maybe trac is not the right tool, and we should use something else? Anyway, it's probably time to evaluate this tool, and make sure we really need it. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com
2012/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>: > Quick question: is trac the right tool? Which problems we are trying to solve using trac? Are they solved or minimized? > Maybe trac is not the right tool, and we should use something else? Maybe are we using it the right way? I like trac and redmine, the former to projects that are simple, with simple workflow, the second to more complex projects, with sub-project, ticket dependencies and, IMHO, a better notion of "progress" for tickets and milestones. Which goals we want to achieve? regards -- Dickson S. Guedes mail/xmpp: guedes@guedesoft.net - skype: guediz http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:15 -0300, Dickson S. Guedes wrote: > 2012/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>: > > Quick question: is trac the right tool? > > Which problems we are trying to solve using trac? Are they solved or minimized? > Good questions. I use it so that I don't forget a bug to fix, and a feature request to work on. > > Maybe trac is not the right tool, and we should use something else? > > Maybe are we using it the right way? > > I like trac and redmine, the former to projects that are simple, with > simple workflow, the second to more complex projects, with > sub-project, ticket dependencies and, IMHO, a better notion of > "progress" for tickets and milestones. > > Which goals we want to achieve? > For me, tracking bugs, and feature requests. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:15 -0300, Dickson S. Guedes wrote: >> 2012/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>: >> > Quick question: is trac the right tool? >> >> Which problems we are trying to solve using trac? Are they solved or minimized? >> > > Good questions. I use it so that I don't forget a bug to fix, and a > feature request to work on. I think that's a reasonable and valuable use of it. >> > Maybe trac is not the right tool, and we should use something else? >> >> Maybe are we using it the right way? >> >> I like trac and redmine, the former to projects that are simple, with >> simple workflow, the second to more complex projects, with >> sub-project, ticket dependencies and, IMHO, a better notion of >> "progress" for tickets and milestones. >> >> Which goals we want to achieve? >> > > For me, tracking bugs, and feature requests. If anything we'll move to Redmine eventually, purely because that's what we're using elsewhere in the project by default now. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Jun 18, 10:35 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > > <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:15 -0300, Dickson S. Guedes wrote: > >> 2012/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info>: > >> > Quick question: is trac the right tool? > > >> Which problems we are trying to solve using trac? Are they solved or minimized? > > > Good questions. I use it so that I don't forget a bug to fix, and a > > feature request to work on. > > I think that's a reasonable and valuable use of it. > > >> > Maybe trac is not the right tool, and we should use something else? > > >> Maybe are we using it the right way? > > >> I like trac and redmine, the former to projects that are simple, with > >> simple workflow, the second to more complex projects, with > >> sub-project, ticket dependencies and, IMHO, a better notion of > >> "progress" for tickets and milestones. > > >> Which goals we want to achieve? > > > For me, tracking bugs, and feature requests. > > If anything we'll move to Redmine eventually, purely because that's > what we're using elsewhere in the project by default now. I use trac to file the occasional bug and follow up on it. Redmine would be just as well for me. Regards Erwin