Обсуждение: Re: 1.2.2 testing ==> [PROBLEM]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de]
> Sent: 24 May 2005 13:52
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Raphaël Enrici; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.2 testing ==> [PROBLEM]
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> > Hmm, I think Andreas will need to figure this one out - I
> can't see the problem :-(
>
> This is a wx weirdo, a wxObject ptr may not be zero (even if
> you expect
> it to be zero)
> After a longlonglong period of thinking I remembered that
> wxStaticCast
> needs to be redefined. Backport of workaround committed to svn.

Great - thanks Andreas. I'll roll 1.2.2 as soon as Raphael et al. confirm there's no other problems.

/D

Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de]
>>Sent: 24 May 2005 13:52
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: Raphaël Enrici; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.2.2 testing ==> [PROBLEM]
>>
>>Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>>Hmm, I think Andreas will need to figure this one out - I
>>
>>can't see the problem :-(
>>
>>This is a wx weirdo, a wxObject ptr may not be zero (even if
>>you expect
>>it to be zero)
>>After a longlonglong period of thinking I remembered that
>>wxStaticCast
>>needs to be redefined. Backport of workaround committed to svn.
>
>
> Great - thanks Andreas. I'll roll 1.2.2 as soon as Raphael et al. confirm there's no other problems.

As usual... nothing to say :)
Andreas, you know what? You rock!  (I've tried to track this bug down
but I didn't find anything else but this: "I don't understand what's
goin' on" ;)

I'm uploading pre-package to my own site and will ask "ow" to test them
so that we have a first user feedback.

@pgadmin-hackers: let's test it, let's release it... :)

Cheers,
Raphaël

Raphaël Enrici wrote:

>>Great - thanks Andreas. I'll roll 1.2.2 as soon as Raphael et al. confirm there's no other problems.
>
>
> As usual... nothing to say :)
> Andreas, you know what? You rock!  (I've tried to track this bug down
> but I didn't find anything else but this: "I don't understand what's
> goin' on" ;)

The problem is hidden behind some macros, which doesn't display too well
in backtraces.

Regards,
Andreas