Обсуждение: which "wx2.6" should we use ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

which "wx2.6" should we use ?

От
Raphaël Enrici
Дата:
Hi Andreas,

I was just facing a build problem concerning dbgrptg.cpp in wx2.6 and
found your report about it [1]. So, could you precise the wxWidgets
version that should be used to build current snapshots and future 1.2.2 ?

Regards,
Raphaël
[1]http://lists.wxwidgets.org/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?5:mss:60876:nlicjcgeeghooedgcofc

Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ?

От
Andreas Pflug
Дата:
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I was just facing a build problem concerning dbgrptg.cpp in wx2.6 and
> found your report about it [1]. So, could you precise the wxWidgets
> version that should be used to build current snapshots and future 1.2.2 ?

Um, this was a 2.5.5 problem, said to be fixed immediately (thus
included in 2.6). If not, this is worth an error note on wx-dev.
Try to disable debug reporting, hopefully there's a config option
available for that (there are no plans to use dbgrpt so far)

Regards,
Andreas

Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ?

От
Raphaël Enrici
Дата:
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Raphaël Enrici wrote:
>
>>Hi Andreas,
>>
>>I was just facing a build problem concerning dbgrptg.cpp in wx2.6 and
>>found your report about it [1]. So, could you precise the wxWidgets
>>version that should be used to build current snapshots and future 1.2.2 ?
>
> Um, this was a 2.5.5 problem, said to be fixed immediately (thus
> included in 2.6). If not, this is worth an error note on wx-dev.
> Try to disable debug reporting, hopefully there's a config option
> available for that (there are no plans to use dbgrpt so far)

You Rock!

./configure --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) \
        --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \
                --infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info \
                --with-gtk --enable-gtk2 --enable-unicode \
                --enable-mimetype=no \
                --disable-shared \
                --enable-debug --disable-debugreport \
                --with-flavour=pga3

Cheers,
Raphaël

Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ?

От
"Dave Page"
Дата:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Raphaël Enrici
> Sent: 05 May 2005 20:43
> To: Andreas Pflug
> Cc: PgAdmin Hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ?
>
>                 --with-flavour=pga3

                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

What the heck does that do?

Regards, Dave.

Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ?

От
Raphaël Enrici
Дата:
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
>>[mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
>>Raphaël Enrici
>>Sent: 05 May 2005 20:43
>>To: Andreas Pflug
>>Cc: PgAdmin Hackers
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ?
>>
>>                --with-flavour=pga3
>
>
>                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> What the heck does that do?

something I love! But, let's take a look to the content of the package
I'm building for wx2.6:
...
/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3/wx/
...
/usr/bin/wx-config->/usr/lib/wx/config/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3
...
an so on...

It helps me not clashing with files provided by other wx packages for my
own package :)

That's something I learnt from Ron in the end of last year when he was
preparing a wx 2.5 release for Debian.

Raph.

Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ?

От
"Dave Page"
Дата:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz@club-internet.fr]
> Sent: 05 May 2005 21:03
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Andreas Pflug; PgAdmin Hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ?
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> >>[mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> >>Raphaël Enrici
> >>Sent: 05 May 2005 20:43
> >>To: Andreas Pflug
> >>Cc: PgAdmin Hackers
> >>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ?
> >>
> >>                --with-flavour=pga3
> >
> >
> >                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > What the heck does that do?
>
> something I love! But, let's take a look to the content of the package
> I'm building for wx2.6:
> ...
> /usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3/wx/
> ...
> /usr/bin/wx-config->/usr/lib/wx/config/gtk2-unicode-debug-stat
> ic-2.6-pga3
> ...
> an so on...
>
> It helps me not clashing with files provided by other wx
> packages for my
> own package :)
>
> That's something I learnt from Ron in the end of last year when he was
> preparing a wx 2.5 release for Debian.

Very cool.

/D

Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ?

От
Raphaël Enrici
Дата:
Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz@club-internet.fr]
>>Sent: 05 May 2005 21:03
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: Andreas Pflug; PgAdmin Hackers
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ?
>>
>>Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
>>>>[mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
>>>>Raphaël Enrici
>>>>Sent: 05 May 2005 20:43
>>>>To: Andreas Pflug
>>>>Cc: PgAdmin Hackers
>>>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ?
>>>>
>>>>               --with-flavour=pga3
>>>
>>>
>>>                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>>What the heck does that do?
>>
>>something I love! But, let's take a look to the content of the package
>>I'm building for wx2.6:
>>...
>>/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3/wx/
>>...
>>/usr/bin/wx-config->/usr/lib/wx/config/gtk2-unicode-debug-stat
>>ic-2.6-pga3
>>...
>>an so on...
>>
>>It helps me not clashing with files provided by other wx
>>packages for my
>>own package :)
>>
>>That's something I learnt from Ron in the end of last year when he was
>>preparing a wx 2.5 release for Debian.
>
>
> Very cool.

yes, but not compatible with our configure script. Just posted a mail
concerning this to Adam and pgadmin-hackers.

Raph