Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | z4aloin5laepwqhmg6h3jlnatta5cntsvlvzqpajpejfpnyz7v@ufltmwo4y5ml обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2025-10-15 19:39:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > > I have spotted a couple of buildfarm failures for buildfarm member > > phycodorus on REL_14_STABLE and REL_13_STABLE: > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=phycodurus&dt=2025-10-15%2009%3A12%3A36 > > phycodorus seems to be running a remarkably ancient LLVM version. It intentionally tests the oldest supported version... If we don't care, I'm happy enough to just remove the animal. > I wonder if we should just write these off as "probably an LLVM bug". I'm not sure that's really convincing, given that REL_16_STABLE seems to not have an issue? Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: