Re: index prefetching
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: index prefetching |
Дата | |
Msg-id | xw56ywdes77rfiyyy5cpxml5rirj3lthrqx6hezi2rqofz6oj7@lmxwnmcjayjt обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: index prefetching (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: index prefetching
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2025-08-15 15:42:10 -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 3:38 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > I see absolutely no effect of the patch with shared_buffers=1GB and a > > read-only scale 200 pgbench at 40 clients. What data sizes, shared buffers > > etc. were you testing? > > Just to be clear: you are testing with both the index prefetching > patch and your patch together, right? Not just your own patch? Correct. > My shared_buffers is 16GB, with pgbench scale 300. So there's actually no IO, given that a scale 300 is something like 4.7GB? In that case my patch could really not make a difference, neither of the changed branches would ever be reached? Or were you testing the warmup phase, rather than the steady state? Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: