Re: User locks code

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > 
> > > I definitely agree with Vadim here: it's fairly silly that the
> > > contrib userlock code is GPL'd, when it consists only of a few dozen
> > > lines of wrapper for the real functionality that's in the main backend.
> > 
> 
> I was incorrect in something I said to Vadim.  I said stored procedures
> would have to be released if linked against a GPL'ed backend. 

Only to those you actually distribute this product to. If you're using
it internally, you have no obligations to release it to anyone, to
give one example.

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.