Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thom Brown
Тема Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders
Дата
Msg-id x2xbddc86151003310824o936a468fnce9825c10a48a3b0@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On 31 March 2010 15:45, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>    could not accept connection from the standby because max_wal_senders is 0
>
>> Well, that might still leave someone confused if they had one standby
>> and were trying to bring up a second one.
>
> I'd suggest something like "number of requested standby connections
> exceeds max_wal_senders (currently %d)"

Oh, that's much better than anything I thought of.  +1.

...Robert


That provides more explicit information. :)
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pending patch: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance Enhancement/Fix for Array Utility Functions