On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander escribió:
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> > Magnus Hagander escribió:
>> >> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:43, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Didn't change:
>> >> > * be-secure.c: the URL http://www.skip-vpn.org/spec/numbers.html is
>> >> > down, and I can't find an active copy anywhere else, so I didn't try
>> >> > to change this. archive.org still has it though (
>> >> > http://web.archive.org/web/20011212141438/http://www.skip-vpn.org/spec/numbers.html
>> >> > )
>> >>
>> >> The page in archive.org also refers to skip.org, which has expired and
>> >> been eaten. Perhaps we should just remove that comment completely?
>> >
>> > Eh? The above link works for me (and contains suggested DH parameters,
>> > though not in the format expected by be-secure.c).
>>
>> Interesting - must be a routing issue or something then, because I
>> still can't get to it. I've tried from machines in several different
>> countries, though...
>
> Maybe I was unclear. The archive.org URL works for me, the skip-vpn.org
> one doesn't (neither does skip.org).
Ok. Then yes, I read you wrong.
I'm unsure if linking to archive.org is a good thing. I guess it's not
likely to go away, but my original comment remains - perhaps we should
just remove it and let people google for the info if they need it.
> I must note that I tried the archive.org URL last night again upon
> seeing your email and was very surprised because it told me that that
> URL wasn't archived -- in fact none of skip-vpn.org was archived. Today
> it works again.
Strange.
>> Does the content of what you get on the site actually match what you
>> get on the site itself?
>
> When you say "the site", which site are you referring to?
skip-vpn.org.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/