Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Дата
Msg-id x2udcc563d11005011919u4bb08e84tede444fb14b651aa@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
Список pgsql-general
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Craig Ringer
<craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:
>
> I'd be looking at management, reliability, backup, integration into the
> rest of the infrastructure, product longevity, support, etc. Performance
> you can always throw hardware at.

And given the relatively high costs of a MSSQL installation, you can
throw a LOT of hardware at a PostgreSQL server.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Следующее
От: Mike Christensen
Дата:
Сообщение: Am I supposed to be all scared of compound primary keys?