Re: headerscheck ccache support
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: headerscheck ccache support |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | wl6njth2qlrhyd2pacu7zpjyt2ot7ott36ewz234t6rxhfu3bd@53lkneutiavd обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: headerscheck ccache support (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: headerscheck ccache support
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2025-11-21 13:14:18 +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2025-Nov-21, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > # Verify headerscheck / cpluspluscheck succeed > > # > > - # - Don't use ccache, the files are uncacheable, polluting ccache's > > - # cache > > So how bad is the effect of the cache pollution that's now going to > occur? I imagine we don't really care. (I have no idea how to measure > this, and probably it's a waste of time just to try.) I don't think there's any cache pollution after this change - the pollution the comment was referencing was that ccache's cache would be filled with entries for files that would *never* be used and would therefore be useless. With this change the added use of ccache will just accelerate the CI runs, which I wouldn't consider polluting... Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: