Re: Filesystem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От J. Andrew Rogers
Тема Re: Filesystem
Дата
Msg-id web-9626787@mx1.neopolitan.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Filesystem  ("Martin Fandel" <martin.fandel@alphyra-evs.de>)
Ответы Re: Filesystem  ("Martin Fandel" <martin.fandel@alphyra-evs.de>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:06:41 +0200
  "Martin Fandel" <martin.fandel@alphyra-evs.de> wrote:
> i have only a little question. Which filesystem is
>preferred for postgresql? I'm plan to use xfs
>(before i used reiserfs). The reason
> is the xfs_freeze Tool to make filesystem-snapshots.


XFS has worked great for us, and has been both reliable
and fast.  Zero problems and currently our standard server
filesystem.  Reiser, on the other hand, has on rare
occasion eaten itself on the few systems where someone was
running a Reiser partition, though none were running
Postgres at the time.  We have deprecated the use of
Reiser on all systems where it is not already running.

In terms of performance for Postgres, the rumor is that
XFS and JFS are at the top of the heap, definitely better
than ext3 and somewhat better than Reiser.  I've never
used JFS, but I've seen a few benchmarks that suggest it
is at least as fast as XFS for Postgres.

Since XFS is more mature than JFS on Linux, I go with XFS
by default.  If some tragically bad problems develop with
XFS I may reconsider that position, but we've been very
happy with it so far.  YMMV.

cheers,

J. Andrew Rogers

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How to avoid database bloat
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query plan for very large number of joins