Re: Sort time

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Sort time
Дата
Msg-id web-1827471@davinci.ethosmedia.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Sort time  (pginfo <pginfo@t1.unisoftbg.com>)
Ответы ANALYZE and indexes (was Re: Sort time)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
Pginfo,

> Sort  (cost=100922.53..100922.53 rows=22330 width=215) (actual
> time=109786.23..110231.74 rows=679743 loops=1)
>   ->  Hash Join  (cost=9153.28..99309.52 rows=22330 width=215)
> (actual
> time=12572.01..56330.28 rows=679743 loops=1)
>         ->  Hash Join  (cost=2271.05..91995.05 rows=30620 width=198)
> (actual
> time=7082.66..36482.57 rows=679743 loops=1)
>               ->  Seq Scan on a_sklad s  (cost=0.00..84181.91
> rows=687913
> width=111) (actual time=6812.81..23085.36 rows=679743 loops=1)
>               ->  Hash  (cost=2256.59..2256.59 rows=5784 width=87)
> (actual
> time=268.05..268.05 rows=0 loops=1)
>                     ->  Hash Join  (cost=2.52..2256.59 rows=5784
> width=87)
> (actual time=125.25..255.48 rows=5784 loops=1)
>                           ->  Seq Scan on a_nomen n
>  (cost=0.00..2152.84
> rows=5784 width=74) (actual time=120.63..216.93 rows=5784 loops=1)
>                           ->  Hash  (cost=2.42..2.42 rows=42
> width=13)
> (actual time=0.57..0.57 rows=0 loops=1)
>                                 ->  Seq Scan on a_med med
>  (cost=0.00..2.42
> rows=42 width=13) (actual time=0.24..0.46 rows=42 loops=1)
>         ->  Hash  (cost=6605.19..6605.19 rows=110819 width=17)
> (actual
> time=5485.90..5485.90 rows=0 loops=1)
>               ->  Seq Scan on a_doc d  (cost=0.00..6605.19
> rows=110819
> width=17) (actual time=61.18..5282.99 rows=109788 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 110856.36 msec

Pardon me if we've been over this ground, but that's a *lot* of seq
scans for this query.   It seems odd that there's not *one* index scan.

Have you tried indexing *all* of the following fields?
S.FID
N.OSN_MED
S.IDS_NUM
N.IDS
S.IDS_DOC
D.IDS
(check to avoid duplicate indexes.  don't forget to VACUUM ANALYZE
after you index)

-Josh Berkus







В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Josh Berkus"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?
Следующее
От: "Josh Berkus"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sort time