Re: SQL99 feature list

Thomas,

> So, a question: should I list all features in the same table, with
> the
> comment field indicating if something is not (yet) supported, or
> should
> I split the features into two tables for supported and unsupported
> features? The former keeps all of the information together if someone
> is
> looking something up by feature, and the latter reduces the number of
> required comments and makes it easier to see the complete list of
> supported features.

Can't we put the list in a database and generate both? <grin>

Seriously, I vote for 2 lists.   

-Josh