On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:57 AM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
> I too much preferred the older installer to that oneclick thing, and regret
> that we the users aren't at least given a choice.
You're free to maintain the old one if you like. Be warned though - it
had a much higher failure rate than the one-click installer (which
based on the ratio of downloads to bug reports, is down to something
like 45000:1 at this point, or a 99.997% success rate).
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com