> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 09:27:23PM +0200, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 06:21:33PM GMT, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, I think the 0004 patch is about to be mostly obsoleted by
> > Andrei's proposal at [1]. To the extent that it's not obsoleted,
> > I question whether it's something we want at all, given the ground
> > rule that unprivileged users are not supposed to have access to info
> > about the server's filesystem.
>
> To be clear -- I don't have a case for 0004 myself, except some vague
> expectation that in certain situations it could be useful to know which
> shared objects are loaded, even if they are not Postgres modules. Based
> on the feedback from the original thread [2], there were couple similar
> opinions, maybe folks could reply here whether [1] would be sufficient
> for them.
Better late than never, rebased and dropped 0004.