Re: 4G row table?
От
Manfred Koizar
Тема
Re: 4G row table?
Дата
Msg-id
vnp50vgu2htr6tvoijh486n037pkll40jl@4ax.com
Ответ на
4G row table? (george young)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
4G row table? george young <gry@ll.mit.edu>
Re: 4G row table? Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Re: 4G row table? Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: 4G row table? "Charles H. Woloszynski" <chw@clearmetrix.com>
Re: 4G row table? "Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: 4G row table? Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>
Re: 4G row table? Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:10:58 -0500, george young wrote: >with 4 billion(4e9) rows. >How big will the primary index on the first seven columns be? If you manage to pack the key into 8 bytes (by using a custom 1 byte integer datatype) and if there are no NULLs: 75 GB with a 100% fill factor, 114 GB with a 66% fill factor, realistically something in between. Note that frequent updates can cause index growth. >Will this schema work at all? You have a somewhat unusual identifier : payload ratio (8B : 1b). It depends on the planned use, but I'm not sure if *any* database is the right solution. You have "only" 30670848000 (30G) possible different key combinations, more than 1/8 of them (4G) are actually used. A 7-dimensional array of double-bits (1 bit to indicate a valid value and 1 bit payload) would require not more than 8 GB. If you plan to use a database because you have to answer ad-hoc queries, you will almost certainly need additonal indices. Servus Manfred
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления