The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> On Sun, 7 Mar 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I will pursue fixing things that way in the 6.5 sources. In the
> > meantime, do we want to check Kevin's fixes into REL6_4, or is adding
> > int8 support for more machines too low-priority to justify taking any
> > chance of breaking 6.4.3?
>
> Note that I commited int8 fixes to the v6.4.3 tree, and they are in the
> current beta3 tar file...did this mid-last week...
Did you also change the #ifdef line to include __NetBSD__ for the %qd
format? At least NetBSD/i386 uses that. Alpha might not, I'm not
fully certain, but I think it will work with %qd.
--Michael