On 3 Dec 2004 20:34:36 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <bwr607@hotmail.com> wrote:
>David Harmon <source@netcom.com> wrote in
>news:41c44692.42645781@news.west.earthlink.net:
>
>> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:29:40 +0000 (UTC) in news.groups, Marc G.
>> Fournier From: <scrappy@hub.org> wrote,
>>>The pgsql.* hierarchy is a not a private one, it is a public one
>>>carried by several of the large usenet servers.
>>
>> What are the rules for creating new groups in pgsgl.*?
>>
>>
>
>Fiat-only by Marc. ;-)
I think that the term that is occasionally used is that the hierarchy
has a hierarchy czar. That is the most straightforward way to manage
a hierarchy. I did not say that it was the best or the worst, only
the most straightforward. It doesn't address the question of what
happens if the czar disappears, for instance.
- - Bob McClenon