Aw: First psycopg3 docs
| От | Karsten Hilbert | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Aw: First psycopg3 docs | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | trinity-991ceed6-31a1-43fc-a219-b075ec77d5d5-1605289047367@3c-app-gmx-bs22 обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | First psycopg3 docs (Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: First psycopg3 docs | 
| Список | psycopg | 
Hello Daniele, I see that the Cursor.execute() will continue to support a Mapping for passing in values. Perhaps my understanding is lacking, so here goes: Will using a mapping still allow for use of the binary protocol ? I am asking because all the examples I've seen show the %s (rather than %(varname)s way of value passing). In GNUmed I nearly always use %(varname)s with dicts as that allows for easier collection of values before the execute() call without needing to account for the *order* of values. Karsten
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: