Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Hallgren
Тема Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128.
Дата
Msg-id thhal-0bx8XBE2g8bQ6TrpBvg64oJN7k4PZsR@mailblocks.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Is it sensible to try to prevent people from raising the GUC variable
> higher than the platform will allow?  It seems we can know the limit on
> Windows, but on most other platforms I don't think there's any good way
> to find it out.  (Which is why max_stack_depth is a SUSET variable ---
> you're assumed to know what you are doing if you change it.)
> 
I have PL/Java users that set a ridiculously high value in 
max_stack_depth just to circumvent the check altogether since it breaks 
when the executes code using another thread then main (see previous 
discussion "stack depth limit exceeded problem" started 9/23 for more info).

If you plan to limit the GUC setting, please, *please*, also provide a 
way for PL/Java to switch stack_base. I will write the patch immediately 
if you approve.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jeffrey W. Baker"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems