Re: tuple radix sort
| От | cca5507 |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: tuple radix sort |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | tencent_1FF6C288DAB8947599693C9B833F3BB2D007@qq.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: tuple radix sort (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: tuple radix sort
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I also thought we should change this cast:
>
> if (ssup->comparator == ssup_datum_signed_cmp)
> {
> - norm_datum1 = orig + ((uint64) PG_INT64_MAX) + 1;
> + norm_datum1 = orig + (Int64GetDatum(PG_INT64_MAX)) + 1;
> }
>
> Upthread you mention something else about treating Datum as an
> integer, but I'm not sure if this is what you meant since you didn't
> say. If you have concrete suggestions, feel free to share them.
I think we can keep it as is now. The idea of don't treat datum as an integer comes from:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8246d7ff-f4b7-4363-913e-827dadfeb145%40eisentraut.org
--
Regards,
ChangAo Chen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: