Re: [PATCH] psql: tab completion for ALTER ROLE ... IN DATABASE ...
| От | zengman |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] psql: tab completion for ALTER ROLE ... IN DATABASE ... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | tencent_0C77CC5645E519121D45D90B@qq.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] psql: tab completion for ALTER ROLE ... IN DATABASE ... (Dharin Shah <dharinshah95@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] psql: tab completion for ALTER ROLE ... IN DATABASE ...
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The only thing I’m cautious about is treating “pset.db is NULL/invalid” as just another “quoting failure” case. In thiscompletion branch we call PQescapeLiteral(pset.db, ...) before we ever reach exec_query(), so an explicit guard is aboutavoiding passing an unusable handle into libpq in the first place. Even if libpq were to return NULL in that situation,it’s > not something I’d want to rely on implicitly. > That’s why I suggested the explicit guard: it matches the general psql style of checking !pset.db before calling libpqAPIs (e.g. psql_get_variable() in src/bin/psql/common.c checks !pset.db before calling PQescapeLiteral()), and it makesthe intent obviously safe. Behavior-wise it’s the same (fall back to ALL), just more defensive/clear & explicit. Hi, Okay, I understand what you mean, thank you. -- Regards, Man Zeng www.openhalo.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: