On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Here's the fine patch. The actual code changes are simple and seem to
>> work as expected, but I struggled a bit with the phrasing of the
>> messages. Feel free to suggest improvements.
>
> Stick with the original wording? I don't really see a need to change it.
I don't think that's a good idea. If we just say that the remaining
connection slots are for superusers, someone will inevitably ask us
why their superuser replication can't connect. I think it's important
to phrase things as accurately as possible.
...Robert