On 2005-10-26, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com> writes:
>> Um, what? Under what conditions is it permissable for simple arithmetic on
>> (only) timestamptz values (which may have originated in different timezones
>> neither of which is the current one) to be dependent on the current timezone
>> setting?
>
> Timestamp subtraction will give different answers depending on whether
> there's a DST adjustment in between.
no, it _WILL NOT_.
In your example, the result is different between timezones because the
_input data_ is different. '2005-10-31'::timestamptz designates a different
time in US/Eastern than it does in Japan, or UTC, or whatever.
Or to put it in terms of the code: in 8.0, timestamptz_in is stable
rather than immutable (since it depends on timezone), while timestamptz_mi
is immutable (result depends only on the input values).
In 8.0, I'm guaranteed that for timestamptz values, a+(b-a) = b in all
cases regardless of timezone. 8.1 has broken that.
> BTW, if we were doing subtraction symbolically as I think we should,
> these *would* give the same answer, ie, '3 days' in both cases. Care to
> rethink your opposition to that idea?
No. If you want symbolic subtraction, that's what age() is for. If you
break the subtraction operator, you leave no means of doing _accurate_
subtraction.
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services