Re: inet increment with int
| От | Andrew - Supernews |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: inet increment with int |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | slrndhsl70.1vfu.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | inet increment with int (Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: inet increment with int
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2005-09-06, Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > Now with: > > test=# select '192.168.0.0/24'::inet + 1; > ERROR: Trying to increment a network (192.168.0.0/24) rather than a host What possible justification is there for this behaviour? > test=# select '192.168.0.1/24'::inet + -1; > ERROR: Increment returns a network (192.168.0.0/24) rather than a host While I suspect I know where this idea came from, it is equally boneheaded since it is making completely unwarranted assumptions about how inet values are being used. -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: