On 2005-06-22, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> writes:
>>> I thought we agreed that using the cancel functionality, which we know
>>> works and is tested,
>
>> I've seen cancel *not* working. In 80 % this was the reason to use
>> terminate.
>
> Even a moment's perusal of the code will prove that there is no
> situation in which a backend will respond to SIGTERM but not SIGINT
"idle in transaction". (or "idle" for that matter, but that's usually less
significant.)
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services