Re: Large Tables/clustering/terrible performance
| От | Michael McAlpine |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Large Tables/clustering/terrible performance |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | sc306ce2.046@gw.oregonian.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Large Tables/clustering/terrible performance
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks for the reply. Explain results: NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: Seq Scan on table1 (cost=0.00..163277.83 rows=1 width=300) EXPLAIN Michael >>> "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org> 12/31 1:37 PM >>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Michael McAlpine wrote: > Hi, > > Why does Postgres have such poor response times on LIKE queries. > > In my database I have 1 table of 3.5 million rows. I try the follogin search > > select * from table1 where name like 'SMITH, JO%'; > > > this query takes 1:30 seconds to return the matching row. > > I have physically order the table by name and added an index to name > and performed a vacuum analyze to see if that helps. but still 1:30 > for a result. > > I have built the same setup on a MS SQL Server database and get > response times of 1 to 2 seconds for the same query. What does explain say? -jwb
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: