Re: Large Tables/clustering/terrible performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael McAlpine
Тема Re: Large Tables/clustering/terrible performance
Дата
Msg-id sc306ce2.046@gw.oregonian.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Large Tables/clustering/terrible performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Thanks for the reply.

Explain results:

NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:

Seq Scan on table1  (cost=0.00..163277.83 rows=1 width=300)

EXPLAIN


Michael



>>> "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org> 12/31 1:37 PM >>>


On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Michael McAlpine wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Why does Postgres have such poor response times on LIKE queries.
>
> In my database I have 1 table of 3.5 million rows.  I try the follogin search
>
> select * from table1 where name like 'SMITH, JO%';
>
>
> this query takes 1:30 seconds to return the matching row.
>
> I have physically order the table by name and added an index to name
> and performed a vacuum analyze to see if that helps.  but still 1:30
> for a result.
>
> I have built the same setup on a MS SQL Server database and get
> response times of 1 to 2 seconds for the same query.

What does explain say?


-jwb



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jeffrey W. Baker"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large Tables/clustering/terrible performance of
Следующее
От: "Jeffrey W. Baker"
Дата:
Сообщение: 7.2 changes to varchar truncation