Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 20:24 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > >> I think it will be confusing if we change the name, so I vote to not > > >> change the name. > > > > > Actually, I would vote yes to change the name. > > > > I lean that way too. If there were no history involved, we'd certainly > > prefer pg_upgrade to pg_migrator. > > Yeah, that was my feeling too. People like "pg_upgrade", or something > else? I will add some text like "pg_upgrade (formerly pg_migrator)" in > the docs.
OK, seems people like pg_upgrade, but do we call it "pgupgrade" or "pg_upgrade"? I don't see consistent naming in /contrib: