Hi Dave,
I thought I addressed that in the long paragraph near the bottom of this
message.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2005-07/msg00283.php
This seems to me that it doesn't require any new datatypes and doesn't
require that we know the type on the server side ahead of time. Am I
missing something?
-Kevin
>>> Dave Cramer <davec@postgresintl.com> 07/25/05 1:43 PM >>>
The challenge with this, is that we don't know ahead of time what
type the
underlying data is. If we did this is a trivial problem. Right now we
bind the
parameter in the statement to a timestamptz type. If we knew ahead of
time, we
could easily bind it to a timestamp.
The simplest solution that Christian has is to create two types that
extend PGobject and do exactly as above.