Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Дата
Msg-id rwhdaxlspkwwoya5zrbladp2hjfzfv6jgfxszfpcas5aam4bva@an6ppsumqe66
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2025-12-02 12:02:39 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 09:59:52PM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2025-12-02 11:46:56 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> I doubt that we can drop this check yet.  There are still a lot of
> >> places in the tree that need to be switched from off_t to pgoff_t,
> >> like the buffer APIs, etc.
> > 
> > Hm? What are you thinking about re buffer APIs?
> 
> buffile.h and buffile.c still have traces of off_t.

Oh, I was interpreting buffer as bufmgr.c...



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: