Re: Why our Valgrind reports suck
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why our Valgrind reports suck |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | qjdu5pdeo4zmj2lswqhpsgqclhkutym64sl4suv3gd55zntocx@xv2z6xn5excw обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Why our Valgrind reports suck
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-05-09 11:29:43 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> We currently don't reset TopMemoryContext at exit, which, obviously, does
> massively increase the number of leaks. But OTOH, without that there's not a
> whole lot of value in the leak check...
Briefly looking through the leaks indeed quickly found a real seeming leak,
albeit of limited size:
ProcessStartupPacket() does
buf = palloc(len + 1);
in TopMemoryContext() without ever freeing it.
I have wondered if we ought to have some infrastructure to tear down all
relcache, catcache entries (and other similar things) before shutdown if
MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING is enabled. That would make it a lot easier to see
leaks at shutdown. We certainly have had leaks in relcache etc...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: