Re: ALTER TABLE uses a bistate but not for toast tables
От | Dmitry Dolgov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER TABLE uses a bistate but not for toast tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | pizwatztwg6a74gsfhtwwybsgu2guwvskb4jm44i4uoe3x5pae@64q3fxbkstnq обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER TABLE uses a bistate but not for toast tables (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALTER TABLE uses a bistate but not for toast tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 03:43:24PM GMT, Justin Pryzby wrote: > @cfbot: rebased Hey Justin, Thanks for rebasing. To help with review, could you also describe current status of the patch? I have to admit, currently the commit message doesn't tell much, and looks more like notes for the future you. The patch numbering is somewhat confusing as well, should it be v5 now? From what I understand, the new patch does address the review feedback, but you want to do more, something with copy to / copy from? Since it's in the performance category, I'm also curious how much overhead does this shave off? I mean, I get it that bulk insert strategy helps with buffers usage, as you've implied in the thread -- but how does it look like in benchmark numbers?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: