Re: Postgres performance
От | PFC |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | opsm8dq2c7th1vuj@musicbox обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres performance (bertolima@yahoo.it (mauro)) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
>> Really ? >> In my experience this is a sure way to get >> inconsistencies slowly >> creeping into your database, and you also get a load >> of funky concurrency >> issues. > Yes, you are rigth... my insert/update are very simple > and without problems and so I think to use 'foreign > key' coded to make faster/simpler the management and > don't overloading the db (and use exception code > management )... but I had a problem with pgSQL because > server was very busy and the same query was replicate > (because users refresh the page... :( ) so now I've > foreign keys... It's a typical case, program being stopped between insertion of parent and child row. Although in this case FK's is not the solution, transactions are. > What about it? (i think it's the same with mySQL...) > I don't know how users can connect to... 1, 10, > 1000... I must create a pool with 1000 connections? is > this fine? if connections aren't released I must > reset manually, it is dangerous... do you think? Just set the max number of connections for postgres a bit higher than the max number of apache processes in apache.conf.
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: