Re: BUG #7635: psql -1 and \connect
От | Marko Tiikkaja |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #7635: psql -1 and \connect |
Дата | |
Msg-id | op.wm37n7a0ye4vw9@blue.lan обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #7635: psql -1 and \connect (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:29:50 +0100, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > pgmail@joh.to writes: >> I know it's not clear what to do with --single-transaction if a script >> is >> \connecting to multiple databases in a single file, but IMHO it should >> at >> least work correctly for the single database case. > > Define "correctly" --- I would expect \connect to establish a new > connection even if the same target database is named. We can't change > that behavior without breaking existing scripts, IMO --- for example, \c > is a long-established way to reset GUC settings, prepared statements, > etc. Hmm.. I only considered the case where the \connect is at the beginning of the file. I see your point. > Perhaps we should have \connect fail outright in -1 mode. I can see > no way for it to do anything and still maintain the expectation of a > single transaction. Would supporting a \connect at the very beginning of the file seem possible? Maybe even only if it's to the same database? Regards, Marko Tiikkaja
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: