Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pierre C
Тема Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows
Дата
Msg-id op.vne45kfjeorkce@apollo13
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Tom Polak <tom@rockfordarearealtors.org>)
Ответы Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows
Список pgsql-performance
> The hardware it
> is running on is fairly good, dual Xeon CPUs, 4 GB of RAM, Raid 5.

For a database you'd want to consider replacing the RAID1 with a RAID1 (or
RAID10). RAID5 is slow for small random updates, which are common in
databases. Since you probably have enough harddisks anyway, this won't
cost you. Linux or freebsd would also be better choices for postgres
rather than windows.

Also, as said, your issue looks very much like a problem in the way your
application communicates with postgres : if it takes postgres 5 ms to
process the query and your application gets the result 8 seconds later,
there is a problem. Note that SQL Server probably takes just a few ms for
such a simple query, too, so your not really benchmarking SQL server
either.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hardware recommendations
Следующее
От: alaricd@pengdows.com
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hardware recommendations