Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pierre C
Тема Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow
Дата
Msg-id op.vm0055s0eorkce@apollo13
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow  (Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr>)
Ответы Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow  (Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr>)
Список pgsql-performance
> So, I did. I run the whole script in psql, and here is the result for
> the INSERT:
>
> realm_51=# explain analyze INSERT INTO drones_history (2771, drone_id,
> drone_log_notice, drone_temperature, drone_pressure) SELECT * FROM
> tmp_drones_history;
>                                                        QUERY PLAN
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Seq Scan on tmp_drones_history  (cost=0.00..81.60 rows=4160 width=48)
> (actual time=0.008..5.296 rows=5150 loops=1)
>   Trigger for constraint drones_history_fk__drones: time=92.948
> calls=5150
>   Total runtime: 16779.644 ms
> (3 rows)
>
>
> Now, this is only 16 seconds. In this 'batch' I've inserted 5150 rows.
> The batch before, I run that one 'the usual way', it inserted 9922 rows,
> and it took 1 minute and 16 seconds.
>
> I did not, however, enclose the process into begin/end.
>
> So, here are results when I, in psql, first issued BEGIN:
>
> realm_51=# explain analyze INSERT INTO drones_history (2772, drone_id,
> drone_log_notice, drone_temperature, drone_pressure) SELECT * FROM
> tmp_drones_history;
>                                                        QUERY PLAN
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Seq Scan on tmp_drones_history  (cost=0.00..79.56 rows=4056 width=48)
> (actual time=0.008..6.490 rows=5059 loops=1)
>   Trigger for constraint drones_history_fk__drones: time=120.224
> calls=5059
>   Total runtime: 39658.250 ms
> (3 rows)
>
> Time: 39658.906 ms
>
>
>
>     Mario
>

Note that in both cases postgres reports that the FK checks take 92-120
milliseconds... which is a normal time for about 4000 rows.
Inserting 4000 lines with just a few fields like you got should take quite
much less than 1 s...

Where the rest of the time goes, I have no idea. Disk thrashing ? Locks ?
Gremlins ?

- try it on a fresh copy of all your tables (CREATE TABLE, INSERT INTO
SELECT)
- try to put the WAL on a separate physical disk (or do a check with
fsync=off)
- try it on another computer
- try it on another harddisk
- run oprofile on a debug compile of postgres
- it could even be the process title updates (I don't think so but...)
- try a ramdisk tablespace

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Pierre C"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow
Следующее
От: pasman pasmański
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tidscan not work ? Pg 8.4.5 + WinXP