Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
От | Pierre Frédéric Caillaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | op.u6jpripycke6l8@soyouz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? ("fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:28:07 +0100, fkater@googlemail.com <fkater@googlemail.com> wrote: > Pierre Frédéric Caillaud: > >> > 4 Core CPU 3 Ghz, WinXP, 1 TB SATA disk. >> >> Big CPU and slow disk... >> >> You should add another disk just for the WAL -- disks are pretty cheap >> these days. >> Writing the WAL on a second disk is the first thing to do on a >> configuration like yours, if you are limited by writes. >> It also reduces the fsync lag a lot since the disk is only doing WAL. > > Good idea -- where can I set the path to WAL? At install, or use a symlink (they exist on windows too !...) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1901405/postgresql-wal-on-windows I've no idea of the other needed NTFS tweaks, like if there is a noatime/nodiratime ?...
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: