Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
| От | Pierre Frédéric Caillaud |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | op.u6jpripycke6l8@soyouz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? ("fkater@googlemail.com" <fkater@googlemail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?
Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used? |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:28:07 +0100, fkater@googlemail.com
<fkater@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Pierre Frédéric Caillaud:
>
>> > 4 Core CPU 3 Ghz, WinXP, 1 TB SATA disk.
>>
>> Big CPU and slow disk...
>>
>> You should add another disk just for the WAL -- disks are pretty cheap
>> these days.
>> Writing the WAL on a second disk is the first thing to do on a
>> configuration like yours, if you are limited by writes.
>> It also reduces the fsync lag a lot since the disk is only doing WAL.
>
> Good idea -- where can I set the path to WAL?
At install, or use a symlink (they exist on windows too !...)
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1901405/postgresql-wal-on-windows
I've no idea of the other needed NTFS tweaks, like if there is a
noatime/nodiratime ?...
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: