Re: performance config help
От | Pierre Frédéric Caillaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: performance config help |
Дата | |
Msg-id | op.u6d7bfnucke6l8@soyouz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: performance config help (Bob Dusek <redusek@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> Each of the 256 requests was being processed by a php process. So, it > could > certainly be faster. But, the fact that we're seeing the db performance > degrade would seem to indicate that our application is fast enough to > punish > the db. Isn't that true? Not necessarily. Your DB still has lots of idle CPU, so perhaps it's your client which is getting over the top. Or you have locking problems in your DB. Things to test : - vmstat on the benchmark client - iptraf on the network link - monitor ping times between client and server during load test Some time ago, I made a benchmark simulating a forum. Postgres was saturating the gigabit ethernet between server and client... If those PHP processes run inside Apache, I'd suggest switching to lighttpd/fastcgi, which has higher performance, and uses a limited, controllable set of PHP processes (and therefore DB connections), which in turn uses much less memory. PS : try those settings : fsync = fdatasync wal_buffers = 64MB walwriter_delay = 2ms synchronous commits @ 1 s delay
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: