Re: Integrity on large sites
От | PFC |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Integrity on large sites |
Дата | |
Msg-id | op.tsuaprtbcigqcu@apollo13 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Integrity on large sites ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Integrity on large sites
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Flickr uses InnoDB, by the way. On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:07:21 +0200, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Dave Page wrote: > >>> problem with your setup. Granted, MySQL is a pretty bad database, but >>> it's not *that* bad -- your example implies that heavily MyISAM-based >>> (you don't say whether this is MyISAM or InnoDB) sites such as >>> Slashdot and Flickr should be falling over every hour. >> I'm not going to comment on who's fault it is, but the OP quoted 100 >> updates and 600 selects per *second*. I can't imagine Flickr or Slashdot >> (which is heavily csched for reading) are under anything like that sort >> of constant load. > > Uhmmm.... I would not be surprised at *all* at slashdot or flickr doing > that type of velocity. We have customers right now that under peak are > doing 10 times that and yes these are customers that have similar types > of websites. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: