Re: Postgres Benchmark Results

On Mon, 28 May 2007 05:53:16 +0200, Chris <dmagick@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>>     I am re-running it with other tuning, notably cost-based vacuum
>> delay and less frequent checkpoints, and it is a *lot* smoother.
>>     These take a full night to run, so I'll post more results when I
>> have usefull stuff to show.
>>     This has proven to be a very interesting trip to benchmarkland...
>
> [ rather late in my reply but I had to ]
>
> Are you tuning mysql in a similar fashion ?

    Well, the tuning knobs are different, there are no check points or
vacuum... but yes I tried to tune MySQL too, but the hardest part was
simply making it work without deadlocking continuously.